By way of opening, yes, I am aware that BR does not exist anymore. This however, is an opinion about the whole rail network and it seemed fitting to put it here, after all, as you will see, BR had its merits.
Many of us rely on rail travel every day and there can be few people who have ... Read review
NH Hotels, the hotel chain leader in Europe, with more than 300 hotels in 20 countries in Europe, Latin America and Africa. Enter into our web site and find the best available tariff at all times
Record Rent a Car is present in the main spanish airports and has a very wide fleet. We offer: exceptional discounts, free additional drivers,
unlimited mileage... subscribe to our Club Record and take advantage of special offers.
Advantages: will get you from A to B - eventually Disadvantages: need I comment?
By way of opening, yes, I am aware that BR does not exist anymore. This however, is an opinion about the whole rail network and it seemed fitting to put it here, after all, as you will see, BR had its merits.
Many of us rely on rail travel every day and there can be few people who have never been on a train. Whether we use the railways for daily commuting or the occasional trip away we should be able to rely on the fact that ... ...time and get to their destination with the minimum of delay.
That’s what should happen. In reality we are faced with a crippled rail network, poor rolling stock and high prices. Rail travel is no longer guaranteed to get you to your destination on time or at all. The infrastructure has got so bad that from every corner there is a cry. The public blame the government, current labour or former conservative (or both). The rail ... more
By way of opening, yes, I am aware that BR does not exist anymore. This however, is an opinion about the whole rail network and it seemed fitting to put it here, after all, as you will see, BR had its merits.
Many of us rely on rail travel every day and there can be few people who have never been on a train. Whether we use the railways for daily commuting or the occasional trip away we should be able to rely on the fact that there will be trains, that they will turn up on time and get to their destination with the minimum of delay.
That’s what should happen. In reality we are faced with a crippled rail network, poor rolling stock and high prices. Rail travel is no longer guaranteed to get you to your destination on time or at all. The infrastructure has got so bad that from every corner there is a cry. The public blame the government, current labour or former conservative (or both). The rail unions come under scrutiny. Railtrack (now in administration) gets cited as a company unable to carry on its affairs. But whoever is to blame it is becoming increasingly important that we sort things out, and quickly.
The London Chamber of Commerce was recently quoted as having said that the recent round of SWT, Arriva and Scotrail strikes cost businesses over £100m. That figure will comprise lost revenues, contracts, added travel costs and so on for the companies concerned. I am one of those lucky people who rely on SWT everyday. I worked from home during the strike but fortunately my job allowed me to do so and I have the technology at home to allow me to do my job without hindrance (broadband internet, phone and fax). How many others are in such a fortunate position?
The railways have been through all sorts, a nationalised industry, sold off under the conservative government and interfered with by the present labour government. Once anti-privatisation, new labour seem keen now to insist that the way forward is to have private investment! They shy away from renationalisation but yet were perfectly happy to pull the plug on Railtrack and are seemingly happy to get into the latest rows about pay and conditions of rail employees (although, to quote Mr Byers “it is not for the Government to intervene directly in disputes between private companies and their employees”). Me thinks they are confused!
The rail network is almost unique creature. It is a collection of private companies utilising another company’s tracks (Railtrack) to carry the PUBLIC. Everything that the private companies do affects the man on the street, whether he likes it or not. If the Ford workers at Dagenham go on strike, the only people affected are Fords and possibly the dealer networks. When the rail workers go on strike the public is affected. The rail companies lose goodwill and a little revenue but as well over 50% of a rail companies income is from season ticket holders their loss is reduced (you do get compensation for strike days, but at a lower rate than the cost of a single daily ticket). Business suffers as staff cannot get into work. People may even die as essential services find themselves understaffed and emergency vehicles unable to cut through the traffic jams that abound. Extreme? I don’t think so.
The government has recently unveiled the Strategic Rail Authority’s (“SRA”) plan for the future of the rail network. This has come under criticism from the word go. A rehash of old plans, doesn’t go far enough, has got its priorities wrong, are all claims that could be made of the plan.
There is no doubt that the railways have historically been underfunded and mismanaged. The famous West Coast mainline was budgeted to cost £2b. Latest estimates put that figure closer to £7b. Track maintenance suffered, cruelly exposed in the Hatfield disaster. Months of remedial work followed with trains put under speed limits until every inch of track was inspected. At what cost? Men were working 24 hours a day and, it was strongly rumoured that they were actually volunteering to work on Christmas Day, why? simple, they were being paid a small fortune to do so (figures of £2,000 a day were quoted).
So, the solution proffered by the SRA? In today’s money £4.3 billion each year over the next 10 years with a government subsidy of £2.94 billion (again at current prices). No mention of where the £1.36b shortfall is to come from.
There is a promise of new rolling stock by 2004. Now this may make delays more comfortable (and possibly prevent some of the “technical difficulties”) but its not really going to help us get to our destinations on time. Look at the C2C line where new rolling stock was introduced and then quickly removed from service because of unreliability. The slam-doors were brought back!
The end of 2003 should see the Train Protection Warning System installed which will prevent trains from going through red signals. This one is more laudable but how about just having drivers who stay awake and read the signals – oh sorry, I forgot, if you actually make them do their job (or worse discipline them for not doing their jobs) they go on strike!
Most controversial of all is the provision of £700m for station improvements. Whilst there are undoubtedly some stations that could do with a lick of paint is a tarted up station really going to make us feel better about using the railways? The newly painted toilets will doubtlessly be locked because of the risk of vandalism, the waiting room will be cold because it will be unsafe to have heating in there and will smell strongly of urine and the station clock will be wrong, no, sorry, correction, the station clock will run to the new equivalent of BR time (ie whatever time it feels like showing or not as the case may be). And in any case the trains will be up and running again so why should I need to wait? Build me a new hospital instead.
We can all moan about the state of the railway but that offers no answers. For the sake of argument I am going to try to proffer some suggestions that I think might work.
CLAIRE's BOTTOM TEN TIPS TO GET THE RAILWAYS BACK UP AND RUNNING:
1 – The government have said that they want to cut down on the number of franchises that run the network. Why not renationalise or have only one company running the show. This should result in a less fragmented network (you may actually be able to buy a rail ticket to go from A to B where you can travel on any train and not just the trains of one operator). The railways are not going to be hugely profitable for a long time and investment will be easier if you have the whole network to work with.
2 – State funding would also mean that the railways could be run on a not for profit basis (which is, I think being considered anyway). This would stop the cutting of corners.
3 – Make the rail workers akin to the police, not being able to strike. As with the rest of us, if you don’t like the conditions or your pay deal go find another job. I was incensed at the fact that in the current economic climate rail guards felt able to strike when offered a pay rise. I’m sure there are many who would welcome a pay rise rather than a cut or threat of redundancy that many are facing.
4 – The concern for the travelling public is, I am sure, how reliable the service is, not whether you have an electric door or a newly covered seat. That can wait. Let’s sort out the system first.
5 – Although 70% of rail traffic everyday is in the South East one should not forget the other major cities around the country. After all not 70% of the rail traffic starts in the south east every day!
6 – When looking at the track thought should also be given to providing more “passing points” to relieve the situation when a train breaks down. Many rails go for miles and miles on a one track up, one track down basis. If there is a problem with a train or the track then the whole line grinds to a halt.
7 - Consider the needs of the travelling public when selecting train length or use the highest common denominator all of the time.
8 - If the Timetable is constantly not being met then look at why and consider revising the timetable (as SWT does in autumn on a particularly leafy stretch of line).
9 - Work in conjunction with town planners and major businesses to discover their needs, after all, it is generally because of one or both of these that we are travelling at all.
10 ....or we could simply remove the need to commute – forget the railways and use the money to build mini-cities in the suburbs so that people can walk to work – now there’s a vision of the 70s (Milton Keynes/Welwyn Garden City to name but two!).
I would urge all involved in the rail industry to think carefully. Investors are going to be wary after the Railtrack debacle. Commuters are worried after the spate of rail accidents. Casual travellers are switching away from the railway as unreliability is rife. Don’t put on your make up. You cannot make an OAP look 20 with a bit of lippy. Look at the foundations. Get the diet right and the undergarments sorted before applying the make up.
To quote Mr Byer’s himself: “No more vague aspirations or grand visions strong on rhetoric but weak on delivery.”
Finally to my title – more apt than you may have realised. The plain fact is that we will never get the railways sorted under the current government. Not by rail is an anagram of Tony Blair. Fitting eh?
Advantages: Sometimes faster Disadvantages: Oh, far too many to detail
...know that this is the British Rail category and that good old BR don't technically exist anymore but at this point you don't know what I'm going to write about (and hey, neither do I) so tough.
But what am I actually going to address during today's outpouring of drivel? Actually I'll be documenting my experiences as a rail traveller and addressing the pros and cons of chucking away your car keys and heading for the train station instead. What qualifies ... ...are now becoming obvious. While British Rail was in no way perfect, it was more accountable than the current swathe of companies who all promised to make the rail network something that could carry Britain into the 21st century (and there are rumours that suggest that some trains that set off in the 20th century may actually arrive soon...unless they get stopped outside the station for no reason).
Everyone can come up with a tale of woe regarding ...
TheNeil 07.08.2001
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of British Rail
Advantages: Quick easy savings Disadvantages: Must be renewed every year
...They are available from any British rail ticket office and cost £18 for one year at the end of which it must be renewed. If you have never had a young persons rail card the you will need to take along proof of your age such as a passport or driving licence (or for mature students a letter from your academic institution) and a passport size photograph (I'm not sure if its one or two so its probably best to take along 2 just in case). You will also ... ...from the ticket office and student travel centres). Once you have submitted the application form, photo and fee your card is made up on the spot and is ready for immediate use. The card comes in two parts a photo card and the discount ticket, you must show both portions in order to obtain your discount, you also need to have them with you when you are making your journey as ticket inspectors will demand to see it when you show them your ticket. The ...
EarthGirl 27.04.2001
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of British Rail
Advantages: I like trains. Disadvantages: Not enough clear information.
During a recent train journey we had to change trains at Sheffield. This didn’t seem a big problem. I think that at this point I should stress that although I love travelling on trains I don’t use them very often. As we got off the first train the PA system announced that the train we wanted was at platform 3a. We crossed the footbridge, found platform 3, checked on the display monitor that the train was going to Worksop and got on the ... ...announcement on the train that departure would be delayed due to staffing problems. After a short delay the train left. As the train left the station the conductor announced over the train PA system the new expected arrival time at Doncaster. Now we were worried, we didn’t want to go to Doncaster, and unless there had been some major change in train routes we didn’t think a train for Doncaster would go via Worksop. We found the conductor ...
daseaford 27.05.2001
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of British Rail
Advantages: See Opinion Disadvantages: See Opinion
...factual as possible. LB
British Rail doesn't exist any more as a company. Since privatisation in 1995 BR has been split into the infrastructure company (Railtrack (!)) and a number of Train Running Companies (TOCs). Most of the TOCs are owened by bus companies (e.g. First Great Eastern - First Group & W.A.G.N - National Express). Some companies have done well (such as Anglia) and some have done badly (such as W.A.G.N).
Now lets go back to the bad ... ...Conservatives. They made it known that they were anti rail. As a result of under investment, B.R tumbled in to £millions of debt. This goes back to Beeching (who was responsible for closing down miles of line. This was to cut back debts and losses made). Anyway, the same story goes on until about 1995. There were three main Train Operating Companies (TOCs) in the UK: Network Southeast(!), Regional Railways and Scotrail. In 1995, the network was in ...
lee.p.best 28.10.2002
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of British Rail
Advantages: It is there, good selection of routes Disadvantages: Dirty, poor food, always late/cancelled, safety aspects, some fellow passengers
...so am forced to use British Rail on a regular basis, whether it be a 20 minute journey to work or a 6 hour trip to see my family in Southport. As I am hoping to pass my driving test shortly, I pray that my usage of the train system will be minimised greatly...
ROUTES/PRICE
British Rail has a very good selection of routes and , with a number of connections, you can get to most of your required destinations. A lot of different rail companies run ... ...CONCLUSION
British Rail is a big let down and it is a shame that so many of us rely on it. It needs to be improved drastically but there is little alternative. They will continue to reap the profits and things do not look like they are about to improve. ...
Okocha 21.03.2001
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of British Rail
Frequency of trains
Reliability of trains
Comfort of trains
On-board facilities
Similar reviews »
Reviews which might be of interest for "British Rail"
Advantages: Great food, interesting service, exceptional waiter Disadvantages: NOISY, really noisy until our lovely waiter turned the music off
of the 1960s, the line that runs between Northampton and Market Harborough was closed down, then opened, then closed again until BritishRail finally called time in 1981. Today the entire length of the line is a public access walking and cycling route called the Brampton Valley Way . The Northampton & Lamport Railway now runs steam trains along a short stretch of the old line with its headquarters at the tiny station behind the Brampton Halt.
We headed in to the restaurant on the dot of half past after looking around the terrace and down towards the lake. It would be a lovely spot on a sunny day but unfortunately for us it was a dreary May evening and much too cold to contemplate sitting outside. Entering the restaurant we were hit by a mass of noise and loud people and I did think to myself 'Oh no, what have I done?' I squeezed through ...
Advantages: Service, quality, new trains Disadvantages: have to work with railtrack who are useless
the time and there are going to be times when the trains are late and have problems, but after decades of under investment and mismanagament by Britishrail is it any wonder? - Rome was not built in a day.
This summer promises even more improvements as the new tilting high speed trains start to come online which will cut journey times even more and these are going to offer on board entertainment and a whole host of other new features.
i have been lucky recently to have the opportunity to travel first class on a number of occasions and another plus for Virgin is the service offered here - it is brilliant.
I would receommend travelling Virgin to anyone as they are certainly the most forward thinking and innovative company operating in our lives at the moment and long may they continue as the operator of mainline and cross country routes ...
andydenton 13.02.2001
· Read full review
Ciao members have rated this review on average: very helpful Review of Virgin Trains
SNCF, La Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer (‘National Society of the Railways’ for non-French speakers), is the name given for the train network in France. Unlike the ridiculous system in Britain, SNCF is nationalised, so provides rail services for the entire country.
Whether it is the nationalisation, or just the way in which SNCF is run, the train network in France is fantastic. Without doubt I can say that it certainly fulfils its aim stated on its website (www.sncf.com - it helpfully has an English version, just click the Union Jack in the top right hand corner): SNCF’s ambition is to become the model for public service companies in Europe.
Although I have not had much experience of SNCF, only two journeys in February half term while I was staying in Lille, I feel that the high quality is sufficient to ...
